Yes, and here we are, Fl primary day, and I'm sticking with Mitt in first, Johnny Mac a close second, despite the guv's endorsement, and Rudy outta the race by tomorrow.
Any other other calls out there?
Yes, and here we are, Fl primary day, and I'm sticking with Mitt in first, Johnny Mac a close second, despite the guv's endorsement, and Rudy outta the race by tomorrow.
Any other other calls out there?
If you've been following this race obsessively, you prolly already know that Michigan was stipped of its delegates to the Dem convention for moving their election date up against party rules. Hillary ended up being the only candidate on the ballot. And yes she won. I get a big kick out of the way her advisers routinely roll that victory into her legit string victories. Are they fooling folks with this? I guess. Still, even they must know how lame it all is.
All of which brings us to Florida, which is in the same boat as Michigan -- no Dem delegates. Despite that, the Clinton campaign has been pitching woo there, most recently by arguing over the last few days that their delegates should be reinstated. And yes, she's going to win big in Florida this Tuesday. And it'll mean nothing delegate-wise, but their hope is that the media will still turn it into a "Hillary's back" story.
The very latest twist in all this is that, despite the fact that the candidates are not supposed to be campaigning in these states, she'll actually be in Florida election eve. One assumes that's so she can give a victory speech in this delegate-free primary. All of which leads us to this lovely quote from Obama campaign spokesman Bill Burton:
"If the Clinton campaign's southern strength rests on the outcome in a state where they're the only ones competing, that should give Democrats deep pause."
This interesting column from the LA Times sums up my feelings this week about the Clintons. The trigger for me was watching the most recent debate. In particular, it was watching Hillary in the first half of the debate say things about Obama she knew were broad, already-refuted mischaracterizations, often with a grin.
We may have to settle for that approach to politics. But I'd rather not.
It's a dash of a day, but there's always time to go on record. I'm saying Obama, Clinton, then Edwards in SC (shooting down Edwards chance at an upset 2nd place finish) with Obama winning by 8 points or better and cleaning up in SC delegates.
Meanwhile, in FL I'm once again going with Mitt who, frankly, has treated me shabbily so far in these predictions and owes me one. Johnny Mac a close second. Rudy outta the race before the 5th.
Any other other calls out there?
Update: In a new low, it appears I didn't even predict the day of the GOP FL primary correctly. It's not today, it's next Tuesday. Boy, wotta mess. Unless... Unless... Unless I did that on purpose to your lower expectations of my oracular accuracy (aka my "oracuracy")? Oooooh, I am clever.
You pay me a buck a year. Just a buck a year! I send you an email every Tuesday that says: "Forgiven."
(I'm telling you, I just got an email that said "forgiven" and it felt fantastic.)
Three tough races to call today -- South Carolina and Nevada for the GOP and Nevada for the Dems. I'm gonna go Huckabee in SC (Evangelicals slog through the rain and snow), with McCain a close second. Thompson comes in third and is finally allowed to quit the race. Romney takes Nevada for the GOP with Fred Paul in second. Nobody particularly cares except Romney, who bursts into song on national TV ("you say Nevada, I say Nevahdah") to mixed reviews.
Clinton leads in the polls in Nevada, Obama has a little more union juice. I'm going with my heart and picking Obama, because yes, yes it's true. I want it to be so.
Update: Once again I look to John Edwards for inspiration. This is a marathon, I say, a marathon, not a sprint, sez Edwards. Yes. That's what this is. This is a marathon that I am losing badly.
So I blew SC, flubbed Nevada Dems, and only got Nevada GOP right, which was a gimme. Still, America insists that I continue to make these shoddy calls and I will not let America down.
The Republicans have their big Michigan primary today. Some say Romney needs to win here to stay viable. And yes, I'm going to keep betting on Romney. Just try and stop from betting on Romney. You can't do it. My Romney-betting impulse is simply too strong. And you are too weak.
If he actually wins, the thing I'm wrestling with is what does he say? He can't flat out say "I'm the comeback kid" because he's been claiming to be in the lead with his "two silvers and a gold" line (second place in Iowa and NH, first place in Wyoming).
On the other hand, he's going to really want to say, "I'm the comeback kid!" because politicians love to say that phrase. It makes them feel like they're gruff, likable, wild west outlaws. Like, you know, "Butch Cassidy and the Comeback Kid."
The best I can figure is that either he'll say, "change change, kid this is comeback personal." Or possibly, "come change back kid personal personal Romney!" Or maybe even, "Romney Romney Romney my dad I am Barack Obama." Whichever he runs with you, you're going to be emotionally impacted. Brace for it.
Also, I'm going with two "dear friends" and three "my friends" for McCain in his quasi-concession speech.
Any other calls?
Update: It's true what they say -- a stopped watch is right twice a day!
OK, the people of New Hampshire have spoken. Their message: I am a crappy prognosticator. And yes, I have heard them loud and clear, but I'm not done fighting! Much like John Edwards, I will continue to get my butt kicked all the way to the convention!
In other news, I'll confess I was shocked when Romney came out of Iowa saying "I'm the outsider candidate of change." Clearly, he had seen what worked for Huckabee and Obama, and was baldly swiping their message.
Anyways, because of that, I was much less shocked tonight when, in his concession speech, he said, "Hi, my name is John McCain and/or Hillary Clinton." You really have to respect somebody that straightfoward.
I'm doubling down today -- echoing my Iowa call by tagging New Hampshire as Obama and, yes, Mitt Romney country. I'm going against the polls a little on Romney, figuring Obama will draw the independents away from McCain. Also, McCain's snickering digs in the ABC debate undermined his all-American-hero brand. But it'll be close.
I'm also going with one "dear friends" and four "my friends" in McCain's speech tonight.
Any other calls out there....?
Update: I'm not looking like a particularly great prognosticator at this point. In fact, I may have gotten it precisely wrong, if independents went for McCain in waves and left Obama in the lurch... But I still think I'll do well in the "dear friends"/"my friends" derby.
A while back, my better half worked on a full-length independent science fiction feature called "Homeworld." Well the movie's now done and ready for it's world premiere -- this coming Sunday, January 13th. The tickets are free, and the theater is pretty huge, so we're encouraging one and all to come and join us for the event. I'll be the one who looks like the picture over on the right, only without the goatee and with both a top and a bottom part to my head.
Here's all the info:
When: January 13th, 2008 @ 5PM
Where: Rheem Theater 350 Park St., Moraga, CA 94556
Admission: Free
Rating: Not rated yet, but think "PG." Kids are welcome.
More info, including directions: Homeworld Site

Hope to see ya there!
Susan Estrich, on Fox last night, put out an interesting piece of misinformation, asking "When was the last time a first-time Democract won Iowa and went on to win the presidency." The answer, it turns out, is 1976 (forgetting for a moment the oddity that in '76 Carter was actually beaten by "uncommitted).
Her implication was that Obama's victory isn't significant because the Iowa winner almost always loses. "Wow -- so I guess Iowa doesn't really matter does it? Good to know." Um. Not quite.
One thought this happy night. I think this is (even) bigger than race. The pundits are underpunditizing(tm) this thing when they make that the focus. The impulse to support Obama comes from a massive hunger to stop the madness, to save this country, to tame all those hatreds, to learn the lessons of Bosnia and Serbia and Shiites and Sunnis, to dig deep and steer this raft away from the waterfall. We can hear the waterfall. We can see the spray. Dig deep.
OK, two more thoughts:
OK, time to wander out on that limb. At 8:58 am on Wednesday the 3rd, based on, well, very little, I'm calling Iowa for Obama (largely because I wish it so) and Romney (organization).
Fortunately, I can edit this post tomorrow if I get it all wrong.
Any other predictions out there?

Photo credit: Image courtesy of Daryl Darko.
Welcome to the conclusion of this three-part interview with guitarist, singer, and songwriter Adrian Belew. If you're just jumping in, be sure to hop back to the start to hear Belew talk about collaborating with King Crimson and the Bears, why the last two years have been so productive, and how he lets goes creatively.
Adrian Belew on the Web: Adrian Belew.net, Elephant Blog, Side Four
Cecil Vortex: Is there anything you've learned about the creative process that's surprised you?
Adrian Belew: I'm impressed to see that if you work really hard at something, it does eventually pay off. And nothing in my life has proven that to me as much as the creative process. Sometimes you do have to work at it; it doesn't always just flow out of you like lava. Sometimes you really do have to sit and [say], "How am I going to make this work? What can I do?" And really go deep within yourself or at least concentrate to such a degree that it gets tiring, you know? So I'm kind of amazed that the process works and that it's still working.
CV: Have you gotten any advice about creativity that particularly stands out?